Construction Time Tracking vs Job Costing: What’s the Difference?

Time tracking and job costing sound similar, but they solve two different problems on a construction site. The former captures labor hours. The latter turns those hours (plus materials, equipment, and overhead) into the real cost of a job. 

When you compare construction time tracking with job costing, you’ll see that accurate hour collection is the starting point for every reliable cost report. For contractors, construction time tracking software makes this easier. They gain a cleaner baseline for payroll, labor burn, and cost allocation, making the downstream job cost report far more accurate.

So, let’s discuss construction time tracking, job costing, and why you need both for reliable budgets and predictable project margins.

Key takeaways:

• Time tracking records verified labor hours and ties them to the correct jobsite, task, and cost code.
• Job costing calculates the financial impact of those hours along with materials, equipment, and overhead.
• Job costing is only as accurate as the labor hours feeding it.

What is construction time tracking?

Construction time tracking means recording verified labor hours tied to the specific jobsite, task, or cost code where the work happened. It replaces handwritten timecards and memory-based reporting with exact timestamps, jobsite location data, and clear task assignments.

Because crews move between sites, switch tasks multiple times, and often work irregular hours, construction time tracking must capture more than a simple clock-in and clock-out.

It needs to document:

• the exact start and end time for each shift
• the jobsite where the worker was located
• the task or cost code tied to each block of work
• travel time between jobs
• breaks and overtime
• multi-site days and job-switch activity

Accurate time tracking

• gives payroll clean hours,
• gives PMs real visibility into labor burn, and
• reduces the corrections and disputes that come from end-of-week guesswork.

What is job costing in construction?

Job costing means calculating the total cost of a project by adding up labor, materials, equipment, subcontractors, and overhead. It gives contractors a clear picture of

• how much each phase of work actually costs and
• how those costs compare to the budget.

Labor is the most variable and error-prone part of any project, so job costing depends heavily on accurate time tracking. If hours are rounded, mis-coded, or tied to the wrong phase, the cost data becomes unreliable and PMs lose visibility into labor burn. 

Clean job costing allows teams to

• track budget vs. actual,
• spot overruns early, and
• make adjustments before the project drifts too far off course.

Key differences between time tracking and job costing

Time tracking and job costing are connected, but they serve different purposes. Time tracking captures verified labor hours in the field, while job costing turns those hours (along with materials and equipment) into the financial picture of a job.

Category	Construction time tracking	Job costing
Purpose	Record verified labor hours	Calculate total project cost and profitability
Data captured	Timestamps, GPS location, job codes, travel	Labor cost, materials, equipment, overhead
Primary users	Crews, foremen, payroll	PMs, accounting, owners
Output	Exact hours by job and task	Budget vs. actual cost visibility
Dependency	None	Depends on accurate time tracking

When time tracking is inaccurate, job costing becomes unreliable. Correct hours are the baseline for every financial calculation that follows.

How time tracking and job costing work together

Time tracking and job costing feed directly into each other. Verified hours from the field become the labor cost inside job costing. So PMs get a real view of how a project is tracking against the budget. When the data is accurate, cost reports reflect what’s actually happening on site; when it isn’t, overruns surface late.

A typical workflow looks like this:

1. A worker clocks in with a verified timestamp and job site location.
2. Hours are assigned to the correct job and cost code throughout the day.
3. Payroll receives clean, verified hours without manual edits.
4. Job costing converts those hours into labor dollars for each phase.
5. PMs track labor burn and compare actual hours to the estimate in real time.

Numerical example

Even small inaccuracies add up fast. If each worker adds just 10 extra minutes per day, a 20-person crew quietly generates 200 minutes of unearned time. At an average small-business wage of $30.42/hour, that’s more than $100/day, or roughly $2,000/month in preventable labor cost.

This is why field teams that rely on paper timecards or late entries often struggle with unpredictable job costs; small timing errors multiply into meaningful swings in labor burn.

Why construction companies need both time tracking and job costing

Construction companies need both time tracking and job costing because labor is the largest and most variable expense on any job. Time tracking provides verified hours tied to the right jobsite and task; job costing converts those hours into labor cost so PMs can see whether each phase is staying on budget.

Why both systems matter:

• Accurate time tracking gives contractors clean, verified hours for payroll.
• Reliable job costing depends on those clean hours to calculate true labor cost.
• PMs get real visibility into labor burn when both systems are aligned.
• Billing stays correct on time-and-materials work when hours map to the right task.
• Multi-phase jobs become easier to forecast with accurate historical labor data.
• Overruns are caught earlier because labor trends show up in real time.
• Reporting to GCs or owners becomes clearer when cost codes and hours match field activity.
• Disputes over hours or tasks drop because the data is verified and consistent.

Accurate time tracking also helps in reducing wage theft and buddy punching, and even padded hours, which directly protects labor costs. 

Learn how verified GPS timestamps flow directly into Workyard’s job costing workflows

Try for free

Common problems when time tracking and job costing don’t line up

When time tracking is inaccurate or incomplete, job costing becomes unreliable immediately. Hours drift, cost codes break, and PMs lose visibility into how a job is actually performing. Most issues come from manual entry, late timesheets, or crews moving between sites without capturing task changes.

Typical problems contractors run into:

• Rounded or padded hours that inflate labor cost.
• Missing job switches because crews forget to change cost codes.
• Incorrect task or phase-coding, which distorts labor burn reports.
• Travel time that’s guessed or added later, making multi-site days unreliable.
• Foremen fixing hours from memory, creating inconsistent data across the week.
• One block of hours recorded for multiple sites, even when the crew moved.
• PMs discovering overruns late, because data doesn’t reflect real field activity.

These issues compound when teams rely on too many tools. Research shows 28% of small business owners waste time waiting for updates across tools, and 29% repeat information across platforms, the same friction crews face when hours and cost codes live in disconnected systems.

Best practices for connecting time tracking and job costing

The most reliable job-cost reports come from crews who track hours accurately, switch tasks when the work changes, and capture movement between sites. The goal is simple: clean labor data in the field produces clean cost data in the office.

Key practices contractors use:

• Use GPS-verified timestamps to capture exact start, stop, and location.
• Require job and task coding at the time of work, not during end-of-week cleanup.
• Prompt crews to switch tasks when moving between phases or sites.
• Track travel time automatically so multi-site days aren’t estimated.
• Review hours daily, while details are still fresh and corrections are quick.
• Give PMs real-time access to labor burn, not weekly updates.
• Use tools that send hours directly into job costing to avoid manual consolidation.

When equipment use changes with task changes, pairing labor tracking with construction time tracking with equipment hours improves job-cost accuracy even further.

Clean labor data protects margin, reduces correction cycles, and gives PMs cost information they can actually act on.

See how Workyard applies these practices with GPS-based task tracking and automatic job-code accuracy.

Book a demo

How Workyard ties time tracking and job costing together

Workyard is a GPS time tracking and job costing platform built for construction and field teams who move across multiple job sites. It captures exact entry and exit times, travel routes, and job or task switches using real-time GPS, so hours reflect where work actually took place. The app works even on low-signal or remote sites, giving crews a simple way to record accurate hours while giving the office verified data they can trust.

How this improves job costing:

• Exact timestamps reduce rounding and padding.
• Job-switch reminders prevent incorrect cost codes and phase drift.
• GPS breadcrumb tracking resolves travel-time disputes.
• Multi-site days are captured accurately as workers move between locations.
• Offline mode ensures hours are recorded even without cell service.
• Verified hours flow directly into job costing so PMs can track labor burn in real time.

If a worker starts the morning on a concrete pour at Site A, moves to Site B for cleanup, and ends the day hauling material to Site C, Workyard logs each arrival, departure, and task switch with GPS precision. This helps contractors maintain cleaner attendance data, which supports both payroll and labor cost accuracy. 

See how Workyard captures accurate hours for crews on the move.