(650) 332-8623Best Certified Payroll Software for Construction in 2026
Compare the best certified payroll software for Davis-Bacon and prevailing wage construction jobs in 2026.
Quick Answer
The best certified payroll software for construction contractors pairs accurate field data with a tool built for Davis-Bacon and prevailing wage reporting. Workyard, a construction operations platform, is the strongest starting point because it captures GPS-verified time, jobs, and cost codes at the source and feeds that data cleanly into payroll and compliance workflows.
For the reporting side, eMars and LCPtracker are purpose-built for WH-347 and electronic submission, Miter and Points North cover the widest range of state-specific forms, and eBacon, Payroll4Construction, and FOUNDATION bundle certified payroll into broader payroll or accounting processing.
Disclosure: Workyard publishes this page and is featured in it. We built these comparisons from publicly available product information, vendor documentation, and independent review sources, and applied the same evaluation criteria to every product listed, including our own. See our review methodology for details.
“Certified payroll software” is an industry term. It describes tools that help contractors collect, calculate, review, and submit certified payroll information. That covers Davis-Bacon and prevailing wage jobs.
It doesn’t mean the software itself is certified or endorsed by the U.S. Department of Labor. Using a certified payroll reporting software doesn’t make a contractor compliant on its own: the contractor or an authorized representative is still responsible for certifying the payroll submission and for the accuracy of what’s submitted.
The eight construction certified payroll software below cover that workflow end to end, starting with the field-time-to-payroll handoff described in Workyard’s prevailing wage guide, then WH-347 prep, fringe benefits and deductions, and electronic submission to systems like LCPtracker and eMars.
List of best certified payroll software
| Brand | WH-347 / electronic submission | Prevailing wage & fringe calculation | Field time/payroll integration | Starting price |
| Workyard | Feeds time and cost-code data to payroll and compliance tools; doesn’t generate WH-347 itself | Prevailing wage & fringe calculation | GPS-verified field time, jobs, and cost codes; exports to payroll and accounting | $6/user/month |
| LCPtracker | Yes, built for electronic certified payroll and WH-347 workflows | Automated validations against Davis-Bacon/prevailing wage rules | Integrates with payroll providers; used heavily by public agencies | Quote-based |
| eMars | Automatically generates WH-347 forms on payroll sign-off | Fringe benefit reporting and wage determination document management | Manual entry or time-clock upload | Quote-based |
| Payroll4Construction | Certified payroll reporting as part of full-service payroll | Certified payroll and union wage tracking within payroll processing | Time tracking integrations; job costing support | Quote-based |
| eBacon | Certified payroll and prevailing wage reporting built in | Fringe benefit management and multi-state wage handling | Time tracking and attendance built into the platform | Quote-based |
| Miter | Generates WH-347 and state-specific forms; submits to 11+ state portals plus LCPTracker, eMars, eComply, Elation | Automated prevailing wage, union rate, and fringe calculation by job location and classification | Native construction payroll platform with built-in time tracking | Quote-based |
| FOUNDATION | Creates print/electronic certified payroll reports for state, federal, and local agencies | Automatic fringe and deduction calculation across rate tables | Payroll module inside FOUNDATION’s construction accounting ERP | Quote-based |
| Points North | Compatible with LCPTracker, eMars, TRS, Elations, MD E-File, eCPR, eComply, AASHTO, and CA DIR portals | Report generation pulls wage/fringe data from connected payroll system | Integrates with ADP, Workday, Paycor, Paychex, UKG, Rippling, QuickBooks | Quote-based |
How we chose
We evaluated each product against the specific parts of the certified payroll workflow it actually supports: field time capture, wage classifications, fringe benefits, WH-347 preparation, and electronic submission to LCPtracker or eMars. We didn’t treat “certified payroll software” as one interchangeable category. See our full review methodology for how we score and verify claims.
How to choose the best certified payroll software
Certified payroll tools split into two groups. One group generates and submits the actual certified payroll report. The other supplies the clean field data those reports depend on. Most contractors on Davis-Bacon or prevailing wage jobs need both pieces working together, which is why payroll officers and back-office teams usually evaluate the two halves separately. Most of these products integrate with existing construction time tracking, accounting, and payroll systems rather than requiring a full switch, which is what makes pairing two tools practical instead of expensive.
- WH-347 and electronic submission support: Does the tool generate WH-347 forms, submit directly to LCPtracker/eMars/eCPR, or only export data for another system to format?
- Multi-agency and multi-state coverage: Can it handle federal Davis-Bacon reporting? Does it also cover the state-specific prevailing wage determination your jobs actually require?
- Fringe benefits, deductions, and classification handling: Does it calculate fringe benefits and deductions, and apply the right wage determination when a worker’s classification or cost code changes mid-week?
- Field-time-to-payroll accuracy: Is the underlying time data clean before it reaches payroll, or does someone reconcile it by hand first?
- Labor compliance and audit trail: Does the system preserve the labor compliance records an auditor would ask for, in line with FLSA recordkeeping requirements?
- Fit with existing accounting: Does it connect to the accounting and finance systems your office already runs on?
Best certified payroll software for construction contractors on Davis-Bacon and prevailing wage jobs?
The deciding factor is which portal the funding agency already requires, not which product has the most features. Many public agencies mandate LCPtracker or eMars, both Davis-Bacon payroll software built for electronic certified payroll, so checking that requirement first narrows the choice before comparing anything else.
When no portal is mandated, on a private prevailing wage job or a federal contract still accepting a mailed WH-347, eMars or Miter can generate the report without adding an agency subscription. Contractors reporting to several states or agencies at once should weigh Miter or Points North, two prevailing wage payroll software options that cover the widest range of state-specific forms and submission portals. None of that matters if the underlying hours are wrong: a field-time platform like Workyard keeps job assignments and cost codes accurate before they reach whichever reporting tool the agency requires.
8 of the best certified payroll software
We based each entry on public documentation, review platforms, and current feature pages, not marketing claims, and applied the same standard to every brand, including Workyard.
1. Workyard – Best overall construction operations platform for certified payroll-ready field data
Contractors on prevailing wage jobs lose the most time reconstructing accurate hours, job assignments, and cost codes after the fact, not filling out the certified payroll form itself. Workyard, a construction operations platform, closes that gap. Its construction time tracking is GPS-verified and job costing is built for crews that move between jobsites, so the hours feeding a certified payroll software downstream are already accurate.
In Workyard’s own customer research, a manager at a mid-sized electrical contracting company said switching from paper timesheets gave the back office “an audit trail of all changes.” That mattered as much for Davis-Bacon reporting as for everyday job costing. A construction operations platform is the data layer other tools calculate and report from, not a replacement for a compliance or payroll system.
Features
- GPS-verified time clock with photo verification and geofenced job sites
- Job and cost-code tracking so hours are already assigned correctly
- Overtime Rule Builder: company- and person-level daily OT, double time, weekly OT, time-of-day rules
- Payroll and accounting integrations: QuickBooks, ADP, Paychex, Gusto, Sage
GPS-verified time and job costing
Every clock-in ties to a geofenced job and cost code, so hours land against the right project and classification the moment they’re logged, not reconstructed later. That matters most when a worker shifts trades or wage classifications mid-week, since the downstream payroll or compliance system isn’t left guessing which prevailing wage rate applies.
Overtime Rule Builder
The self-service builder sets overtime, double time, and time-of-day rules at the company or individual level, matching how many prevailing wage determinations require daily overtime after eight hours rather than the standard 40-hour weekly threshold. It doesn’t handle project-specific, holiday, or drive-time overtime rules that some wage determinations require on individual jobs. Confirm those exceptions with support, or set them up manually per job, before relying on the builder alone for a wage determination.
Pricing
- Free trial or free plan: Yes, a 14-day free trial.
- Starter: $6 per user / month, billed annually. Monthly billing also available.
- Pro, Autopilot, and Enterprise: Contact our sales team (workyard.com/contact-sales) for pricing.
If you have 50+ users, speak to our sales team (workyard.com/contact-sales) for a discounted quote.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
| GPS-verified time reduces disputes over hours worked | Doesn’t generate WH-347 forms or submit to LCPtracker/eMars |
| Job/cost-code tracking gives payroll clean data | Wage rate determination still happens in a connected tool |
| Overtime Rule Builder covers common OT scenarios | No holiday- or drive-time-specific OT rules yet |
| Broad payroll/accounting integrations cut duplicate entry | Field-data layer, not a standalone certified payroll tool |
Ratings
Workyard’s ratings below reflect field-time-tracking and job-costing reviews rather than certified payroll reporting specifically, since that isn’t Workyard’s core function.
| App Store | Google Play | Capterra | G2 |
| 4.0 ⭐(242 ratings) | 3.7 ⭐(254 ratings) | 4.7 ⭐(102 reviews) | 4.8 ⭐(51 reviews) |
Workyard is best for contractors who need accurate, GPS-verified field time and job costing to feed a dedicated certified payroll or compliance tool.
See a demo of how the field-time handoff would work with your existing payroll setup.
2. LCPtracker – Best for public agency oversight of certified payroll compliance
LCPtracker Pro is built for the agency side of certified payroll: it centralizes electronic certified payroll collection across every contractor and subcontractor on a public project, then flags Davis-Bacon and prevailing wage errors before submission. That agency-first design is also why prime contractors and larger subs choose it. It’s the system many public owners already require.
The platform runs over 100 automated validations and math checks against submitted payroll, plus 120+ built-in reports, and includes workforce demographics tracking for local-hire and apprenticeship reporting. It also supports Inflation Reduction Act energy-project compliance, which is increasingly relevant on public infrastructure work.
Features
- Electronic certified payroll collection and management across all project contractors
- 100+ automated validations against Davis-Bacon and prevailing wage rules
- Support for updated WH-347 forms
- Workforce demographics and apprenticeship reporting
Pricing
LCPtracker doesn’t publish pricing; contractors and agencies need to contact sales for a quote.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Purpose-built for Davis-Bacon and prevailing wage validation | No published pricing, so budgeting requires a sales call |
| Widely required by public agencies, easing subcontractor onboarding | Primarily a compliance/reporting layer, not a field time-tracking tool |
| Extensive automated error checking before submission | Learning curve for subs unfamiliar with the platform |
| FedRAMP and SOC 2 Type II security credentials | Best fit is public-agency-heavy work, less so private prevailing wage jobs |
Ratings
The only place LCPtracker shows up in consumer ratings is its OnSite mobile app, and there’s not much there yet: no ratings on the App Store or Google Play, and no Capterra or G2 listing at all.
| App Store | Google Play | Capterra | G2 |
| No ratings yet | No ratings yet | No listing | No listing |
LCPtracker is best for prime contractors and subs working on public projects where the owning agency already runs on LCPtracker.
3. eMars – Best for automated WH-347 generation on federal Davis-Bacon jobs
eMars focuses on one part of the workflow and does it thoroughly: generating WH-347 forms automatically once a payroll period is signed off, then routing them for email, mail, or electronic submission. That narrower focus makes it a straightforward fit for contractors whose main pain point is the federal form itself rather than a full compliance suite.
The platform also centralizes wage determinations, contracts, and project documents in one place, with bulk download for audits, and flags discrepancies in worker hours whether they’re entered manually or uploaded from a time clock system.
Features
- Automatic WH-347 form generation on payroll sign-off
- Centralized wage determination and project document storage
- Manual or time-clock-upload hour entry with discrepancy flagging
- Fringe benefit calculation and reporting
Pricing
eMars doesn’t publish pricing online; contractors need to request a demo or contact sales for a quote.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Automates the WH-347 form specifically, reducing manual formatting errors | No published pricing available for budgeting |
| Centralized document storage simplifies audit prep | Narrower scope than full payroll processing platforms |
| Flags hour discrepancies before submission | Time entry still largely manual unless paired with a time-clock upload |
| Established specifically in the Davis-Bacon compliance space | Less relevant for contractors focused only on state prevailing wage work |
Ratings
eMars runs entirely as a browser-based platform with no native app, so there’s nothing to rate on the App Store or Google Play, and no Capterra or G2 listing either.
| App Store | Google Play | Capterra | G2 |
| No ratings | No ratings | No listing | No listing |
eMars is best for contractors whose main need is fast, accurate WH-347 generation on federally-funded Davis-Bacon projects.
4. Payroll4Construction – Best for outsourced full-service certified payroll processing
Payroll4Construction runs payroll as a service rather than software a contractor self-manages, which appeals to back offices that would rather hand off certified payroll and union tracking than configure another system. A dedicated processor runs each payroll cycle, handling tax filings, direct deposit, and check printing, so there’s no in-house payroll module to set up or maintain.
It handles certified payroll and union tracking as part of full payroll processing, multi-state compliance, and job costing support, with a customer service team reviewers describe as responsive across phone, email, and live chat.
Features
- Certified payroll and union wage tracking within full-service payroll
- Multi-state payroll processing and tax compliance
- Job costing support and time tracking integrations
- Customizable reporting and check printing
Pricing
Payroll4Construction doesn’t publish starting pricing; contractors need to contact sales for a quote.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Full-service processing handles certified payroll and union tracking without extra software | Full-service model means less direct control than in-house payroll software |
| Dedicated processor manages tax filings, direct deposit, and check printing end to end | No published pricing for quick budgeting |
| Handles certified payroll alongside union and multi-state compliance | Best suited to contractors comfortable outsourcing payroll processing |
| Job costing support built in | Less useful as a standalone reporting tool if payroll stays in-house |
Ratings
There are no mobile app ratings for Payroll4Construction on the App Store or Google Play, since mobile time capture runs through a separate integrated time-tracking partner rather than the payroll platform itself. Of the review sites, only Capterra has reviews for it; G2 has none yet.
Payroll4Construction is best for contractors who’d rather outsource certified payroll and union payroll processing entirely than manage it in-house.
5. eBacon – Best for prevailing wage payroll processing with compliance built in
eBacon combines certified payroll and prevailing wage reporting directly with payroll processing, rather than treating compliance as an add-on. That built-in approach is meant to offload the burden of complex reporting requirements from the back office.
It’s built specifically for contractors on government projects, with fringe benefit management, multi-state payroll support, and a self-service employee portal layered on top of core payroll processing.
Features
- Certified payroll and prevailing wage reporting built into payroll processing
- Fringe benefit management and multi-state payroll support
- Time tracking and attendance management
- Self-service employee portal
Pricing
eBacon doesn’t publish pricing; contractors need to contact sales for a quote.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Certified payroll and prevailing wage handling built directly into payroll processing | Reviewers note a learning curve and manual data entry in places |
| Time tracking and attendance built into the same platform | No published pricing, so budgeting requires a sales call |
| Purpose-built for government-project contractors | No free trial available |
| Fringe benefit management handled natively | Smaller review sample size than larger competitors |
Ratings
eBacon holds a solid 4.5 on Capterra, based on reviews of the core payroll platform, but its App Store and Google Play scores run noticeably lower, which points to a rougher mobile experience than the desktop product. It doesn’t have a G2 listing yet to compare against.
| App Store | Google Play | Capterra | G2 |
| 3.2 ⭐(32 ratings) | 3.5 ⭐(57 ratings) | 4.5 ⭐(21 reviews) | No reviews yet |
eBacon is best for government-project contractors who want prevailing wage compliance built directly into their payroll processing.
6. Miter – Best for automated multi-state certified payroll submission
Miter’s certified payroll product automatically calculates prevailing wage, union rates, fringe benefits, and taxes, then generates WH-347 and state-specific forms without re-entering data. Its portal coverage is the widest we found: direct submission to 11 states, including California, New York, New Jersey, and Oregon, plus the third-party compliance platforms LCPtracker, eMars, eComply, and Elation Systems.
That breadth makes Miter a strong fit for contractors working across several states with different certified payroll formats, since it maps state-specific forms like California’s A-131, New Jersey’s MW-562, and Oregon’s WH-141/WH-38 automatically.
Features
- Automated prevailing wage, union rate, and fringe calculation by job location
- WH-347 and state-specific form generation
- Direct submission to 11+ state portals plus LCPTracker, eMars, eComply, Elation
- Submission history and audit logs
Pricing
Miter doesn’t publish pricing online; contractors need to request a demo for a quote.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Widest state-portal coverage of any product in this roundup | No published pricing available |
| Generates WH-347 and state forms without manual re-entry | Newer entrant with a smaller public review history than legacy players |
| Native payroll platform, not just a reporting add-on | Best value likely requires multi-state volume to justify switching |
| Direct submission to LCPTracker, eMars, eComply, and Elation | Smaller footprint outside the states it explicitly supports |
Ratings
Miter’s ratings run the opposite way from most brands on this list: its mobile app is well-reviewed at real volume, but it has no Capterra or G2 listing to check against.
| App Store | Google Play | Capterra | G2 |
| 4.7 ⭐(2.3K ratings) | 4.6 ⭐(723 ratings) | No listing | No listing |
Miter is best for contractors reporting certified payroll across multiple states with different form requirements.
See our Miter alternatives guide for more detail.
7. FOUNDATION – Best for contractors already running FOUNDATION’s construction ERP
FOUNDATION’s payroll module handles certified payroll as one function inside a broader construction accounting system, generating print or electronic certified payroll reports for state, federal, and local agencies. It manages prevailing wage, Davis-Bacon, and union payrolls with automatic calculations and rate tables for multiple states, unions, and trades.
The tradeoff is that FOUNDATION’s certified payroll strength is most valuable to contractors who already run their accounting and job costing on FOUNDATION, rather than to a contractor evaluating certified payroll as a standalone need.
Features
- Print/electronic certified payroll reports for state, federal, and local agencies
- Automatic fringe and deduction calculation across rate tables
- Multi-state, multi-union, multi-trade timecard processing
- Integrated with FOUNDATION’s broader construction accounting ERP
Pricing
FOUNDATION doesn’t publish pricing; contractors need to schedule a demo or call sales for a quote.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Certified payroll built into a full construction accounting ERP | Best value depends on already using (or adopting) FOUNDATION’s accounting suite |
| Automatic fringe/deduction calculation across many rate tables | No published pricing for quick comparison |
| Handles multi-state, multi-union, multi-trade timecards without re-entry | Heavier implementation than a standalone tool for certified payroll alone |
| Established, long-running vendor in construction accounting | Rate tables and reporting setup typically need FOUNDATION’s implementation team, not a self-service configuration |
Ratings
FOUNDATION’s software reviews hold up on Capterra and G2, but its mobile app ratings are the weakest of any brand in this roundup, which matters if field crews will be using it alongside the office team.
| App Store | Google Play | Capterra | G2 |
| 1.7 ⭐(280 ratings) | 2.1 ⭐(436 ratings) | 4.3 ⭐(410 reviews) | 3.7 ⭐(24 reviews) |
FOUNDATION is best for contractors who already run job costing and accounting on FOUNDATION and want certified payroll in the same system.
8. Points North – Best certified payroll add-on for contractors on an existing payroll system
Points North doesn’t ask contractors to switch payroll systems. It plugs into ADP, Workday, Paycor, Paychex, UKG, Rippling, and QuickBooks, plus time-tracking tools like Raken and ClockShark, and generates the certified payroll report from data that’s already there. It’s compatible with essentially every major electronic submission portal, including LCPTracker, eMars, TRS, Elations, MD E-File, eCPR, eComply, AASHTO, and California’s DIR.
That makes it a fit for contractors who like their current payroll provider and just need the certified payroll reporting layer added on top, rather than a full platform switch.
Features
- Weekly certified payroll report generation per government-funded project
- Compatible with nearly every major electronic submission portal
- Direct integrations with major payroll providers and select time-tracking tools
- Automatic report retention and email distribution
Pricing
Points North doesn’t publish pricing; contractors need to contact the company or request a demo for a quote.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Works alongside existing payroll systems instead of requiring a switch | No published pricing for quick comparison |
| Broad electronic submission portal compatibility | Depends on the quality of data already in the connected payroll system |
| Direct integrations with major payroll and time-tracking providers | Adds another vendor relationship rather than consolidating tools |
| Automatic report retention supports audit prep | Less useful for contractors without an established payroll system already |
Ratings
Points North has no standalone app on the App Store or Google Play; it’s built to run inside the payroll systems it connects to, like ADP and UKG, rather than as its own app. Review volume on Capterra and G2 is thin either way.
Points North is best for contractors who want to keep their current payroll provider and add certified payroll reporting on top of it.
Final recommendation
The best certified payroll software depends on what’s already broken: if field hours and cost codes are the weak link, start with a construction operations platform like Workyard to fix the data feeding every downstream report. If the bottleneck is WH-347 generation or state-portal submission itself, eMars, LCPtracker, and Miter cover that layer directly, while eBacon, Payroll4Construction, and FOUNDATION bundle certified payroll into fuller payroll or accounting suites. Most contractors end up pairing two of these rather than relying on one system alone.
References
- 1
eBacon. Certified Payroll. ebacon.com/products/certified-payroll
- 2
Payroll4Construction. Request a Quote. payroll4construction.com/request-a-quote/
- 3
Miter. Get a Demo of Miter. miter.com/request-demo/
- 4
Points North. Contact Points North. points-north.com/contact
- 5
FOUNDATION. Pricing. foundationsoft.com/pricing/
- 6
LCPtracker. Contact Sales. lcptracker.com/contact/contact-sales
- 7
eMars. Contact Sales. emarsinc.com/contact-sales
Automating certified payroll reporting means removing the manual re-entry between three steps: capturing field hours and cost codes, calculating wages, fringes, and deductions, and formatting the result into a WH-347 or state-specific report for submission. Contractors close the first gap with GPS-verified time tracking instead of paper timesheets, the second with payroll software that applies the correct wage determination automatically, and the third with a reporting tool like eMars, LCPtracker, or Miter that generates and submits the form without a re-type. Skipping any one step still leaves a manual bottleneck somewhere in the workflow.
Some certified payroll software generates WH-347 forms automatically, while other products focus on the field data or payroll processing that feeds a separate reporting tool instead of building the form itself. eMars and Miter both automatically generate WH-347 forms from processed payroll data, and LCPtracker supports the updated WH-347 format for electronic submission to agencies and public owners. Field-data platforms like Workyard don’t generate WH-347 forms; they supply the hours and cost codes a WH-347 report is built from. Check which job each product actually does before assuming it covers both.
Miter and Points North both support direct submission to LCPtracker, eMars, and eCPR, and both also cover additional portals like eComply and Elation Systems, which matters for contractors reporting to more than one agency on the same job or state. LCPtracker and eMars are the reporting systems themselves, not third-party connectors to another platform, so contractors already using either one typically submit certified payroll natively rather than through another tool. Confirm which portal an agency actually requires before assuming a connector covers it.
Contractors need accurate weekly hours, job classifications, wage rates, fringe benefits, deductions, and gross wages for every worker on a covered project, all tied to the correct job and cost code before that data reaches payroll. A field-time platform that captures GPS-verified hours and cost codes at the source, like Workyard, reduces the reconstruction work that otherwise happens before payroll can even begin. That accuracy matters most when workers split their week across multiple jobs.
Contractors who are happy with their certified payroll compliance system but frustrated with inaccurate field data don’t need to replace either tool: pairing a construction operations platform like Workyard with the existing system usually solves the actual problem. Workyard’s construction time tracking with payroll integration captures GPS-verified hours, job assignments, and cost codes, then hands that data off through payroll integration to LCPtracker, eMars, or whichever payroll provider already runs certified payroll. That keeps the compliance workflow intact while fixing the data feeding it.
Most certified payroll errors trace back to a worker moving between jobs, trades, or cost codes mid-week without that change getting recorded accurately at the time. A field time-tracking app that lets workers select the correct job and cost code at each clock-in, rather than reconstructing the split at the end of the week, catches the change when it happens instead of during payroll review. Workyard’s job and cost-code tracking works this way. The resulting hours need less correction before they reach a certified payroll report.
Payroll processing software calculates pay, taxes, and deductions, then issues checks or direct deposits, while certified-payroll compliance software specifically formats and submits the Davis-Bacon or prevailing wage reports agencies require for a covered public or government-funded project. Some products, like eBacon and Payroll4Construction, combine both jobs in one platform, which suits contractors who want one vendor relationship. Others, like eMars and LCPtracker, focus specifically on the compliance reporting layer and expect payroll to happen somewhere else.
Some platforms cover both: Miter submits directly to 11-plus state portals plus federal WH-347 workflows, and Points North connects to state-specific systems like California’s DIR alongside federal portals like eCPR, which removes the need to run separate federal and state tools side by side. Contractors working in fewer states may find a narrower tool, like eMars for federal WH-347 work, sufficient without needing that broader multi-state coverage.
Davis-Bacon recordkeeping generally requires payroll and related records to be kept for at least three years after project completion, consistent with federal wage-and-hour recordkeeping standards described in Workyard’s FLSA recordkeeping guide. A certified payroll system should preserve submission history, wage determinations, and time records in a form an auditor can retrieve quickly, since a slow records request is its own compliance risk. Confirm the retention rule for each specific agency before relying on the federal minimum alone.
WH-347 is the federal form the Davis-Bacon certified payroll data maps to, so it stays relevant even when an agency requires electronic certified payroll submission through a portal like LCPtracker or eMars instead of a mailed or emailed paper form. Contractors may still need to produce a WH-347-formatted record on request for a specific audit, a subcontractor’s own files, or an agency that hasn’t moved to electronic certified payroll yet. Most certified payroll software can generate the WH-347 layout alongside the electronic submission.
