Residential time tracking focuses on speed and flexibility across many small jobs. Commercial time tracking focuses on accuracy, job coding, and documentation that supports payroll, job costing, and compliance.
Yes. Residential crews move frequently between jobsites, and GPS time tracking reduces missed switches, rounded hours, and lost travel time without adding steps.
Commercial projects require verifiable start and stop times tied to the correct job, task, and pay rule. GPS provides exact timestamps that hold up for audits, disputes, and certified payroll.
No, geofencing works as a reminder, not a time clock, because it only shows proximity to a site. For payroll accuracy and audits, you typically need GPS-verified time records that capture exact entry and exit times, which is how Workyard approaches construction time tracking.
Yes, if it supports real-time GPS, simple mobile workflows, job and task coding, offline tracking, and audit-ready records in the same system.
It replaces estimated or memory-based entries with exact timestamps, captures travel time, and keeps hours tied to the correct job and task, reducing corrections before payroll runs.
On long-term commercial sites, time tracking shifts from speed to consistency. Crews stay on one job for weeks or months, so stable job codes, repeatable clock-ins, and audit-ready time records matter more than fast job switching.
They require time tracking to capture exact start and stop times, correct labor classifications, and rule-based overtime. The records also need to support certified payroll and hold up in audits.
Residential builds need simple payroll exports with minimal cleanup. Commercial builds need integrations that keep job, phase, and cost codes intact so labor flows correctly into job costing, compliance reports, and audits.
Only use different tools when residential tracking is very simple and commercial work requires strict compliance controls that a lightweight system can’t support.

