Home Compare Best Sage Integrations

Best Sage Time Tracking Apps in 2026

See which construction time tracking apps push job-cost data into Sage, which Sage products they cover, and why status sync needs caveats.

Kyo Zapanta

Kyo Zapanta is a B2B technology writer with 10+ years covering workforce management and SaaS platforms. At Workyard, she covers construction labor compliance, GPS time tracking, job costing, and crew scheduling. She draws on her family background in carpentry and construction to bridge the gap between software and job site reality.

Last updated: August 17, 2026 10 min read

Blueprint-style illustration of a construction site with workers, an excavator, and rebar columns, connected to a phone showing a GPS time clock app, a laptop with job cost and reporting dashboards, and an invoice/payroll document, illustrating Workyard's field-to-office data flow.

Quick answer

Workyard is the best overall pick: a certified Sage development partner with native integrations across all four Sage products (100 Contractor, 300 CRE, 50, and Intacct), a self-serve 14-day trial, and no added connector fee. Plans start at $6/user/month plus a $50/month base fee.

Best runners-up: busybusy, for the broadest native Sage coverage among self-serve tools (Intacct, 100, and 300). And Miter, the only tool here that syncs a project status field, though only for Sage Intacct. The rest of this list, including Workyard, moves job costs and hours but not status.

Disclosure: Workyard, the company publishing this review, also makes one of the products reviewed here. Every tool below, including Workyard, was scored against the same criteria using our published review methodology.

An enterprise concrete contractor running 200-plus workers on WorkMax and Sage 300 CRE described a recurring problem: a foreman picks the wrong cost code in the field, the upload to Sage 300 gets rejected, and someone has to fix the entry in both WorkMax and Sage before the job cost data is usable.

A clean construction time tracking setup is supposed to prevent that back-and-forth. That’s why “does it integrate with Sage” is the wrong question to start with. The right one is what actually moves between the two systems, and whether that includes job status or only job costs.

Eight tools claim some kind of Sage connection. Some are genuinely native. Some route through a paid third-party connector.

One markets “automatic” sync that’s actually a manual export a payroll admin has to trigger by hand. This roundup sorts out which is which, and answers the question every version of this search is really asking. Does project status, not just job costs, actually reach Sage.

What’s changed in this update (July, 2026)

Rebuilt this guide around the two-part question contractors are actually asking AI tools: does job cost data reach Sage, and does project status come with it
Added an explicit product-by-product Sage integration matrix (100 Contractor, 300 CRE, Sage 50, Intacct) with connection type disclosed for every brand: native, third-party middleware, or manual export
Re-verified pricing, ratings, and trial access for all 8 brands directly against current vendor and review-platform pages
Added a Quick Answer, Disclosure, At-a-Glance table, and How We Chose section, and expanded the Other Brands section to cover tools with weaker construction fit or thinner review evidence

List of best Sage time tracking apps in 2026

Brand	Sage products covered	Connection type	Job-cost data sent	Starting price
Workyard	100 Contractor, 300 CRE, 50, Intacct	Native	Yes	$6/user/mo + $50/mo base
busybusy	Intacct, 100, 300	Native	Yes	Free tier; paid from $9.99/user/mo
ClockShark	100 Contractor only	Middleware (Trimble App Xchange, +$60/mo)	Yes	$40/mo base + $9/user/mo
Rhumbix	300 CRE, 100 Contractor	Native (300 CRE); 100 via direct connect/connector	Yes	Contact sales
Miter	100 Contractor, 300 CRE, Intacct	Native, direct API	Yes (+ status, Intacct only)	Contact sales ($15–$50/user/mo reported)
WorkMax	100 Contractor, 300 CRE, 50, Intacct	Middleware (ConnectMax)	Yes	Contact sales
Lumber	Intacct, 100 Contractor, 300 CRE	Native, bi-directional (Intacct)	Yes	Contact sales
ExakTime	50, 100 Contractor, 300 CRE (no Intacct)	Manual batch export (AccountLinx)	Yes, manually triggered	From $9/user/mo

How we chose

We evaluated each tool on Sage product coverage, connection type, fields transferred, and honesty about status sync. We also weighed construction fit, mobile and GPS capability, pricing transparency, and review or trial evidence.

Full scoring approach is on our review methodology page.

How to choose the best Sage time tracking app

Four things decide which of these actually fits your setup, and none of them is whether the vendor’s homepage says “Sage” somewhere. It also helps to be clear that time tracking and job costing are related but separate problems, and a Sage integration only solves the first one well.

Which Sage product you run. Sage Intacct, 300 CRE, 100 Contractor, and Sage 50 are different systems. A brand supporting one doesn’t mean it supports yours, so check the job-cost tracking fields each product actually accepts. When the office team needs broader financial workflows beyond time data, look at how the tool fits the whole construction finance and accounting setup.
Native versus middleware versus manual. Native runs on its own. Middleware adds a monthly fee and a second point of failure. Manual export needs someone to trigger it by hand every pay period. Prefer native, accept middleware only if the rest fits, and treat manual export as a last resort.
What actually transfers. Every tool here moves job costs, hours, and cost codes. Only Miter moves a distinct status field, and only for Sage Intacct. Don’t pick a tool expecting status sync anywhere else in this roundup. Get clear on how cost codes are structured before you assume any integration will map them correctly.
Whether you can test it yourself. Workyard, busybusy, and ClockShark let you sign up today. The rest require a sales call first. Start with those three if trying it yourself matters, and save the demo calls for later.

Best time tracking app that pushes construction job costs and status into Sage?

Workyard is the best overall pick for pushing job costs into Sage, with native sync across all four Sage products and no added connector fee. That’s true for job costs. Status is a separate question, and the honest answer applies to every tool in this roundup, Workyard included.

None of the eight tools here, including Workyard, busybusy, ClockShark, Rhumbix, WorkMax, Lumber, and ExakTime, syncs a true project status field. All of them send job costs, hours, and cost codes instead.

The single exception is Miter, and only on Sage Intacct specifically, where it reads the project’s status field directly.

The practical workaround most contractors use is treating ongoing labor entries against a job as the signal that it’s still active. That’s different from expecting Sage to flag status changes automatically.

8 of the best Sage time tracking apps

Eight tools made the cut for confirmed Sage integration and construction-specific focus. Each section states plainly whether the connection is native, middleware, or manual, and what that means for job costs and status.

1. Workyard – Best overall Sage time tracking app

You get one Sage relationship across your entire company instead of stitching together separate connectors for each product. Workyard is a certified Sage development partner.

The same GPS time clock your crews already use is what feeds Sage on the back end, whether that’s Sage 100 Contractor on a single job site or Sage Intacct across five states.

Because the integration is native rather than routed through a connector, there’s no added monthly fee and no second tool that can go down between your field app and your accounting system.

Features

GPS time clock with geofencing and photo ID verification
Native sync to Sage 100 Contractor, Sage 300 CRE, Sage 50, and Sage Intacct
Job and cost code tagging on every time entry
Offline clock-in with automatic sync on reconnect
Crew scheduling and smart forms
Job costing and payroll-ready reports

Workyard + Sage Integration

All four Sage products get the same treatment: a certified, native connection for Sage 100 Contractor time tracking, Sage 300 CRE time tracking, Sage 50 time tracking, and Sage Intacct time tracking. Here’s what moves for each one.

Sage 100 Contractor (formerly Sage MasterBuilder): worker, date, hours, earn code, project, cost code, and phase. Details on the integration page.
Sage 300 CRE (formerly Sage Timberline): worker, date, hours, earn code, job, and cost code. Details on the integration page.
Sage 50 (formerly Sage Peachtree): worker, date, hours, job, and cost code. More on this integration.
Sage Intacct: worker, date, hours, project, and cost code. More on this integration.

Job costs sync across all four. Project status doesn’t, because none of the four data feeds include a status flag. That’s true across every tool in this roundup except Miter’s Sage Intacct connection.

If you need to know whether a job is still active, ongoing labor entries are the honest signal, not something Sage will tell you automatically.

Getting clean data into that Sage feed still starts with the time card. Workyard’s Time Assistant is built to catch the kind of entry errors that cause Sage rejections in the first place.

Instead of checking a full pay period of time cards one by one, you can ask it in plain language, something like adding a break to every card on a given date.

It reads the whole pay period, proposes the fix per worker, and shows every change before anything is applied. You approve with a reason, and nothing changes without that confirmation. It’s currently available for Enterprise customers.

GPS verification and geofencing

Tracking runs continuously through the shift once a worker clocks in, not just once at the start. Off-site clock-ins get flagged rather than silently accepted into the Sage feed.

For crews on rural sites or new builds with no signal, the app keeps running offline. Time entries and GPS location save to the phone and upload automatically once signal returns, syncing into the same job cost data that reaches Sage.

This kind of clean, verified field data is what keeps job costing numbers usable once they hit Sage. It’s the opposite of the cost-code rejections and rework described above.

Infographic comparing Workyard customer payroll risk before GPS and geofencing to actual savings after, based on the AV Decking case study. — Source: AV Decking case study. The two figures use different time windows (weekly risk vs. six-week savings) and aren’t a direct before/after percentage. They’re reported as the company described them.

Pricing

Starter: $6/user/month (billed annually) plus a $50/month company base fee
Pro: $13/user/month (billed annually) plus a $50/month base fee
Enterprise: custom quote
No separate fee for the Sage integration

Pros and cons

Pros	Cons
Native sync across all 4 Sage products	Scheduling is fairly basic
No middleware fee	No built-in payroll processing
Offline mode built in	No status-field sync (true of every tool here but Miter/Intacct)
Self-serve 14-day trial

Ratings

Ratings hold up across all four sources here, with Capterra and G2 running slightly ahead of the mobile stores rather than pulling in opposite directions.

App Store	Google Play	Capterra	G2
4.1⭐ (228 ratings)	3.8⭐ (236 reviews)	4.7⭐ (102 reviews)	4.8⭐ (49 reviews)

Workyard is the pick if you want one Sage relationship across your whole operation, no extra connector cost, and a self-serve trial to confirm it before you commit.

2. busybusy – Best native Sage coverage among self-serve competitors

busybusy is the best Raken-style alternative for contractors who want to test a Sage integration themselves before buying anything. It was built by contractors for construction crews.

Its Sage coverage is the broadest of any self-serve tool in this roundup: native connections to Sage Intacct, Sage 100, and Sage 300, each with its own dedicated integration page rather than one generic “works with Sage” claim.

Sage 50 is the gap. If your accounting runs on Sage 50 specifically, busybusy simply doesn’t reach it, no matter how strong the other three connections are.

It’s also worth testing the free tier’s scheduling and PTO tools directly, since several reviewers describe them as thinner than the time-tracking side of the product.